How to Use This Tool
Audit promised placements, publish dates and exclusivity windows without estimating sponsorship rates. Analyze sponsor commitments against planned videos, count unassigned placements, detect category exclusivity conflicts, and export a review ledger.
The work this page finishes
A creator can fulfill every promised placement yet accidentally schedule competing sponsors inside a contractual exclusivity window or leave a commitment without a video. For Sponsor Inventory, the row-preserving workspace makes a correction repeatable without rebuilding a prompt or transmitting the source file.
Deterministic workflow
Validate each commitment, compare dates only within the same normalized category, and flag both rows when their distance is within either entered exclusivity window. For Sponsor Inventory, this page accepts at most 5,000 records and 2 MB of text; rejected items retain their row references while valid items remain available.
Why a dedicated interface helps
Review every flag against the signed agreement and preserve disclosure requirements separately; the tool organizes commitments but does not interpret a contract. For Sponsor Inventory, immediate recalculation and a stable export are useful when the same rule must be applied consistently across a list instead of explained one item at a time.
Assumptions
- Dates are publication dates in one calendar.
- Category labels are intentionally normalized by the user.
- Exclusive days are symmetric review windows for this audit only.
For Sponsor Inventory, retain the original source until the destination accepts the result; processing stays in this tab, although the device and installed extensions remain part of the user's security boundary.
Limitations and review boundary
It does not price sponsorships, read contracts, infer category definitions, confirm publication, notify sponsors or decide whether a conflict is legally waived. For Sponsor Inventory, no supplied URL is requested and no pasted markup or code is executed; output is inserted through text-only DOM operations.
Verification and provenance
The implementation was checked against FTC — Disclosures 101 for Social Media Influencers on 2026-08-26, with fixtures for a known answer, an invalid input and a batch-specific edge condition. The sample identifies both VPN commitments as conflicting and keeps the unassigned food placement as a separate data warning.
Sources & assumptions
Tool Spec v2 · verified 2026-08-26. Platform rules and fees can change; the editable inputs remain authoritative for your account.
Official references
- FTC — Disclosures 101 for Social Media Influencers (checked 2026-08-26)
Model assumptions
- Dates are publication dates in one calendar.
- Category labels are intentionally normalized by the user.
- Exclusive days are symmetric review windows for this audit only.
- It does not price sponsorships, read contracts, infer category definitions, confirm publication, notify sponsors or decide whether a conflict is legally waived.
